This website was created because so many people in 2024 still refuse to except the obvious fact that the $hillary, her team, the DNC, the DCCC, DWS, the SuperDelegates the local and national ESTABLISHMENT Democrats, whom will throughout the rest of this site will be known as the damned dem$ who CHEATED to win the nomination!
This is 100% an absolute and very proven fact. It was actually proven in court! Yet the damned dem$ deny it to this day.
$hillary Put tRump in the White House!
This site will prove without question that $hillary and the DNC CHEATED so bad they put tRump in the White House!
The fucking establishment dem$ refuse to accept facts!
The damned dem$ most responisble for putting in the White House by a State basis, the SUPER DELEGATES!
On August 26th, 2017 the Observer posted this article written by Michael Sainato. It headlines as Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders. The court affirmed that the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Hillary Clinton.
Quote: In June 2016, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and former DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz for violating the DNC Charter by rigging the Democratic presidential primaries for Hillary Clinton against Bernie Sanders. Even former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid admitted in July 2016, "I knew everybody knew that this was not a fair deal." He added that Debbie Wasserman Schultz should have resigned much sooner than she did. The lawsuit was filed to push the DNC to admit their wrongdoing and provide Bernie Sanders supporters, who supported him financially with millions of dollars in campaign contributions, with restitution for being cheated. For the rest of this article go to: https://observer.com/2017/08/court-admits-dnc-and-debbie-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders
That is correct folks, the courts actually ruled that the DNC is its own entities and can make its own decisions and it is not loyal to any constutients, especially Progressives!!! We knew it from the beginning that things were being rigged and we were seeing it in front of our eyes. And the damned dem$ would just close their eyes and deny it all.
But let us not just believe one news account, let's see another. The is from The Root, written by Jason Johnson and published on July 6th, 2017. The title is "Democratic National Committee Fraud Lawsuit Is the Biggest Story in Politics That No One Is Talking About". Drop down to the fourth paragraph.
Quote: "In June 2016, Jared Beck and Elizabeth Lee Beck of Beck & Lee filed a lawsuit in Florida against the DNC, Wilding v. DNC Services Corporation, known online mostly as the #DNCFraudLawsuit. The case has slowly wended its way through the courts but has picked up steam in 2017 as court transcripts and allegations of intimidation have become public.
The plaintiffs have filed a class action suit on behalf of three classes of people, arguing that the DNC must return to Bernie Sanders donors, DNC donors and Democrats in general all donations given in the 2016 cycle. Why? They claim that the DNC defrauded donors in the 2016 primary by failing to remain neutral during the contest. Article 5, section 4, of the DNC bylaws states:" For the rest of this article go to: https://www.theroot.com/dnc-fraud-lawsuit-is-the-biggest-story-in-politics-that-1796674709
WILDING v. DNC SERVICES CORPORATION (2019)
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
.Carol WILDING, Stanley Rifken, Sharon Crawford, William Scott Franz, David Pulaski, Mary Jasmine Welch, Jose Alberto Gonzalez, Jane Ellen Plattnxer, Kim Marie Houle, et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. DNC SERVICES CORPORATION, Deborah Wasserman Schultz, Defendants - Appellees
No. 17-14194
Decided: October 28, 2019
Before JORDAN, GRANT and HULL, Circuit Judges.
Elizabeth Lee Beck, Jared Harrison Beck, Beverly Virues, Beck & Lee, PA, Miami, FL, Cullin A. O'Brien, Cullin O'Brien Law, PA, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Antonio Gabriel Hernandez, Antonio G. Hernandez, PA, Miami, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Marc Erik Elias, Bruce V. Spiva, Graham Mead Wilson, Elisabeth Frost, Perkins Coie, LLP, Washington, DC, Mark R. Caramanica, Gregg Darrow Thomas, Thomas & LoCicero, PL, Tampa, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.
In his classic treatise on the United States and its political system, Alexis de Tocqueville famously remarked that "[t]here is almost no political question in the United States that is not resolved sooner or later into a judicial question." Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, Vol. I, at 257 (U. Chicago Press 2000) [1835]. This case, which pits a political party against some of its supporters, confirms de Tocqueville's reputation as an astute observer of American life.
The plaintiffs in this putative class action are donors to the Democratic National Committee, donors to the 2016 presidential campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders, and voters affiliated with the Democratic Party in various states. The defendants are the DNC and its former chairwoman (and current U.S. Representative) Deborah Wasserman Schultz. The plaintiffs essentially allege that during the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries the DNC and Ms. Wasserman Schultz improperly tipped the scales in favor of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who was challenging Senator Sanders for the Democratic presidential nomination.
In their complaint against the DNC and Ms. Wasserman Schultz, the plaintiffs asserted a number of common-law and statutory claims, including fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and unjust enrichment. The district court dismissed all of their claims for lack of Article III standing, see Wilding v. DNC Services Corp., 2017 WL 6345492 (S.D. Fla. 2017), and the plaintiffs appealed.
A
The Democratic Party charter states that its chair "shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and campaigns," and is "responsible for ensuring" that the DNC's national officers and staff also "maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process." First Amended Complaint at ¦ 159.
B
These statements of impartiality, according to the complaint, were false. The DNC was allegedly "biased in favor of one candidate [Secretary] Clinton from the beginning and throughout the process. The DNC devoted its considerable resources to supporting [Secretary] Clinton above any of the other Democratic candidates."
Id. at ¶ 161. And "[t]hrough its public claims of being neutral and impartial, the DNC actively concealed its bias from its own donors as well as donors to the campaigns of [Secretary] Clinton's rivals, including [Senator] Sanders[.]"
If you would like to read the rest of this, it is on the FindLaw website, where they list the complete caselaw to this case. You can find it at https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-11th-circuit/2028824.html.
One thing to be noted is who the lead lawyer was, as he is not just any attorney, it was Marc Erik Elias, founder of Democracy Docket. Marc was the lawyer that won the 61 courts cases contesting tRump's election frauds. He won all his cases!
